
Fannie and Freddie are crossing swords with Washington over energy saving loan programme Washington has earmarked $150 million from the stimulus funds for helping house owners to fix their residences with energy saving devices. The loan would be realized through them through tax benefits covering a period of 20 years. But Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are baulking at this plan.
The two government entities guarantee half the mortgages of residential houses in the country. They are concerned that if the house owners default then the tax liens would get first priority when a foreclosure sale will take place. This would hamper their own interests in realizing dues.
The contradiction between two government departments has led to an impasse with the state government withholding the energy related programmes. Yet it was vital for giving an incentive to the manufacturers of new energy saving devices that would have created jobs while saving energy in the long run.
Last May Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac sent letters to lenders. The letter from Freddie Mac read, “The purpose of this industry letter is to remind seller/servicers that an energy-related lien may not be senior to any mortgage delivered to Freddie Mac”.
But confusion prevails and the lenders are not sure about handling units that carry these energy liens. Those who support the programme are afraid that the lenders who are reliant on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for buying their residential loans would now demand that the full lien be cleared prior to issuing the fresh loan.
The instance of Deke DeKay of Healdsburg of California can be cited as an example. He sold his residence in Geyserville last May. DeKay had bought a foreclosed house for investment purpose and fixed it up with new heating systems. He availed of $11,000 from the programme run by Sonoma County. DeKay said, “We thought this would be an interesting way of upgrading the home’s energy efficiency without adding to the purchase price. Then right before the close of escrow, the bank discovered this stuff”. Fannie and Freddie refused to sanction the loan with clearing of assessment dues first.
DeKay is today a worried man. His house is weighed down with a lien of $25,500 for installing of energy saving devices set up in 2009. It would now be impossible for him to refinance the unit.
If you like this blog please take a second and subscribe to my rss feed
Comments: 5 comments
All the fields that are marked with REQ must be filled
View of the Financial Disaster from 2007 to 2009 | Real Estate Foreclosure Blog
July 29th, 2010 at 1:45 pm
[...] Bear Stearns walked into trouble JPMorgan bought it off for pennies. Washington overreached itself to help the banks with money coming from the taxpayers. It led to widespread [...]
The Financiers Who Sent the World Into Recession | Real Estate Foreclosure Blog
September 30th, 2010 at 2:01 pm
[...] change in the government but not a basic policy change. The voters are totally sickened of Washington but their basic views on the related issues are the same. During the last two years there has been [...]
Question About the Pros and Cons of Allowing Lehman | Real Estate Foreclosure Blog
October 28th, 2010 at 2:20 pm
[...] cons of allowing Lehman to fall continues to haunt analysts. What would have happened last year if Washington had included Lehman in its bail out programme? None can find a suitable [...]
At this Juncture America Needs Not Merely a Politician | Real Estate Foreclosure Blog
November 22nd, 2010 at 1:29 pm
[...] are now walking off with a shrug and no sense of responsibility. The lives of the politicians in Washington do not match their means. The federal agencies are failing but they are being rewarded with even [...]
Foreclosed Willy-Nilly on Borrowers | Real Estate Foreclosure Blog
November 30th, 2010 at 3:40 pm
[...] steamrolling of property laws by the lenders and banks have created a scary situation. For instance Washington Mutual contracted a mortgage loan amounting to millions of dollars on a mountain property close to [...]
Leave a reply